BARR. ABUBAKAR MARSHALL HAS EVERY RIGHT TO WITHDRAW THE BAIL APPLICATION FOR JUSTICE CRACK – HE’S NO LONGER NEEDED IN THE CASE!

The ongoing drama surrounding the bail application for Justice Crack has sparked heated debates across social media platforms. Let us clear the air with the true facts of what transpired. Barrister Abubakar Marshall was in Istanbul Turkey enjoying a well deserved break with some top Nigerian social media influencers popularly referred to as goats when he received information about the case. Driven by his strong passion for human rights and justice he immediately cut short his plans flew back into the country and got actively involved by filing a bail application that many believed had strong chances of securing the release of the client. He put in significant effort time and resources expecting to be properly integrated into the legal process. However things took a different turn when he was allegedly informed that he could only serve as a member of the team and not as the lead counsel. Feeling disrespected and unappreciated after sacrificing his personal plans and travel arrangements Barrister Marshall decided to withdraw the bail application he had filed along with all the efforts he had contributed. This is a civil case that has now become a major public interest matter in Nigeria. As the lawyer who personally initiated and filed the application Barrister Marshall possesses the full legal and professional right to withdraw it especially when he is no longer required or carried along by those handling the matter. His decision should not come as a surprise to anyone who understands how the legal profession works when there is lack of coordination and appreciation. As expected opinions are divided. Some people argue that Barrister Marshall made a mistake by allowing emotions to influence his professional decision saying he should have stayed and fought from within the team for the sake of the client. Others fault Mr Sowore and the handlers of the case for poor communication and failing to value the sacrifice made by the barrister who left his comfort in Turkey to support the cause. Whatever side one supports the truth remains that internal ego clashes and poor coordination have once again affected a case that should focus purely on justice and the liberty of the individual involved. Beyond this particular matter Nigerians need to start seeing the bigger picture. Police brutality military style kidnappings illegal detention and remand of civilians continue to happen across the country on a daily basis. These problems do not check the religion tribe or political affiliation of their victims before striking. Fuel scarcity hunger insecurity and oppression know no boundaries. They affect everyone regardless of whether you are from the North South East or West whether you are Christian or Muslim. If we continue to vote for leaders based on sentiment tribal loyalty or religious affiliation we will keep experiencing the same suffering tomorrow. The system does not care about our differences it preys on all citizens equally. Only when we begin to demand good governance accountability and respect for human rights from our leaders irrespective of where they come from or what faith they practice can we hope for real change in this country. This case is a clear reminder that unity of purpose is more important than individual egos especially when fighting for the rights of citizens against state oppression. Southern Reports will continue to bring you detailed unbiased analysis of matters that affect the ordinary Nigerian. What is your honest take on this matter? Did Barrister Marshall do the right thing by withdrawing his efforts or should he have remained in the team? Drop your thoughts in the comment section let us discuss constructively. Read the full detailed report and updates on Southern Reports. Share this post if you stand for justice and good governance in Nigeria. We must do better as a people. The time for change is now.